Is there such a thing as a spare time psychopath? Probably not, so I guess I'm a professional one. In the last decade or so researchers and experts have published much new knowledge about psychopaths and psychopathy for the public to learn more about this 1% minority of the world. I think some insider information has been missing from the picture and this is why I have decided to contribute with some of the knowledge that only someone who lives with the condition can provide.
The video itself appears to be a game... Lady Gaga all sexed out, surrounded by mostly flamboyant leather wearing dancers... Maybe it's just Metro-sexual, I have no idea...
When it comes to relationships, I like games. Sex is inevitable, but not the primary focus. If it's not about a relationship and just about sex, well, it's just about sex.
I use sex a lot to gain entrance, if you know what I mean. I can do it because I was lucky with looks, haha. But seriously, it's never just about sex - for me anyway.
Sex is cool, no mistaking about that. But it's also one of the most powerful tools in how I work.
And just so there're no mistakes: I'm not a male prostitute in any meaning of the word. Not that I'd care, but there're certain other kinds of economics that suit my personality better.
The sex stuff is a big part of how I work my private sphere.
I don't engage much in love games. I prefer the intellectual approach. I tend to seek up people who have a longing to understand themselves. They often provide all the answers but can't seem to extract the obvious fundamentals.
Well I guess as a rule that's true. But I've pulled quite a few off where I never actually reached the point where I needed to engage sexually with the person.
I deliberately say 'person' because I don't have much preference when it comes to gender, except for where more long-term relationships.
Other than that it's pretty much the same to me which sex I'm playing with.
In 'plays' though, I use with-holding a great deal. I'm sure many people would be surprised at how many gets turned on by this, often to their own surprise as they've never experienced it before - especially women, but males too.
But as a principle love-games is not my preference of choice. I do it often because it often is required in order to get close to someone, but if I could do so without playing love-games I'd like that just as much.
I'd say it's about becoming addicted to another person. Under these circumstances sex and desire and dedication make you fly so incredibly high that it is better than all drugs you can imagine. The weakness, the softness inside. Sigh, I miss that, but I'm not dating psychopaths anymore ;) I want someone attaching to me... and staying with me even though I might have boring days. Other people are becoming boring to me over time as well. It changes when they are alive and don't use the same repetitive pattern in every situation.
6 comments:
The video itself appears to be a game... Lady Gaga all sexed out, surrounded by mostly flamboyant leather wearing dancers... Maybe it's just Metro-sexual, I have no idea...
When it comes to relationships, I like games. Sex is inevitable, but not the primary focus. If it's not about a relationship and just about sex, well, it's just about sex.
I use sex a lot to gain entrance, if you know what I mean. I can do it because I was lucky with looks, haha. But seriously, it's never just about sex - for me anyway.
Sex is cool, no mistaking about that. But it's also one of the most powerful tools in how I work.
And just so there're no mistakes: I'm not a male prostitute in any meaning of the word. Not that I'd care, but there're certain other kinds of economics that suit my personality better.
The sex stuff is a big part of how I work my private sphere.
Notable
Nah, it's not about metro-sex per se, that's just the setting. The video is about sex games and social games in general.
"Lady Gaga all sexed out"
Well aint she always? Yummy!
I don't engage much in love games. I prefer the intellectual approach. I tend to seek up people who have a longing to understand themselves. They often provide all the answers but can't seem to extract the obvious fundamentals.
Notable,
"Sex is inevitable, but not the primary focus."
Well I guess as a rule that's true. But I've pulled quite a few off where I never actually reached the point where I needed to engage sexually with the person.
I deliberately say 'person' because I don't have much preference when it comes to gender, except for where more long-term relationships.
Other than that it's pretty much the same to me which sex I'm playing with.
In 'plays' though, I use with-holding a great deal. I'm sure many people would be surprised at how many gets turned on by this, often to their own surprise as they've never experienced it before - especially women, but males too.
But as a principle love-games is not my preference of choice. I do it often because it often is required in order to get close to someone, but if I could do so without playing love-games I'd like that just as much.
I'd say it's about becoming addicted to another person. Under these circumstances sex and desire and dedication make you fly so incredibly high that it is better than all drugs you can imagine. The weakness, the softness inside. Sigh, I miss that, but I'm not dating psychopaths anymore ;) I want someone attaching to me... and staying with me even though I might have boring days. Other people are becoming boring to me over time as well. It changes when they are alive and don't use the same repetitive pattern in every situation.
Post a Comment